Comparison between Esperanto and Ido

Esperanto and Ido are constructedinternational auxiliary languages, with Ido being derived from Esperanto.

Comparison of related international auxiliary languages.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)

This article contains weasel words: vague phrasing that often accompanies biased or unverifiable information. (December 2009)
This article needs additional citations for verification. (July 2008)
Esperanto flag

Esperanto

Ido flag

Ido

Esperanto was developed by L. L. Zamenhof, who published it in 1887 under the pseudonym Dr Esperanto. It immediately became popular, but soon the members of the movements were making suggestions as to how they thought it might be improved. Zamenhof responded by making a list of possible changes to Esperanto and in 1894 put them before the Esperanto community. If accepted they would create what Dr Zamenhof called “a Reformed Esperanto”. This proposed reformed Esperanto is sometimes referred to as Esperanto 1894. However, when the Esperanto community was invited to vote on whether to adopt the proposals, they rejected the proposals by a large majority.

Ido was created around a quarter of a century after Esperanto. The name Ido means “offspring” in Esperanto and was so named by its creators because it was a development of Esperanto. The creation of Ido led to a schism between those who believed that Esperanto should be left as it was and those who believed that it had what they perceived as inherent flaws which made it not quite good enough to be the world’s international auxiliary language. Those who opposed change maintained that it was endless tinkering that had led, in their opinion, to the decline of Volapük, a once popular constructed language that had predated Esperanto’s publication by a few years. They also cited the rejection of Zamenhof’s 1894 reform proposals.

The languages of Esperanto and Ido remain close, and largely mutually intelligible, like two dialects of the same language. Just as dialects of a language are quite often sources of new words for that language through literature, so Ido has contributed many neologisms to Esperanto (especially in poetic substitutes for long words using the mal- prefix).

One study conducted with 20 college students at Columbia University circa 1933 suggests that Esperanto’s system of correlative words is easier to learn than Ido’s. Two other studies by the same researchers suggest no significant overall difference in difficulty of learning between Esperanto and Ido for educated American adults, but the sample sizes were again small: in the two tests combined, only 32 test subjects studied Ido. The researchers concluded that additional comparative studies of Esperanto and Ido are needed.[1]

. . . Comparison between Esperanto and Ido . . .

Aspect Esperanto Ido Example
Alphabet uses diacritics
(ĉ, ĝ, ĥ, ĵ, ŝ, ŭ)
and a digraph
(dz)
uses digraphs
(ch, sh, qu)
Translation of “chamber”, “shoe”, and “square”:
ĉambro / ŝuo / kvadrato (Esp.)
chambro / shuo / quadrato (Ido)
Gender masculine by default;
feminine optional
gender-neutral by default;
masculine and
feminine optional
Gender of “elephant”:
elefanto (default) / elefantino (fem.) (Esp.)
elefanto (default) / elefantulo (masc.) / elefantino (fem.) (Ido)
Antonyms formed by mal- prefix come from
natural vocabulary
Translation of “warm” and “cold”:
varma / malvarma (Esp.)
varma / kolda (Ido)
Infinitives -i suffix -ar suffix Translation of “to go”:
iri (Esp.)
irar (Ido)
Imperative -u suffix -ez suffix Translation of “go!”:
iru! (Esp.)
irez! (Ido)
Plural noun -oj suffix
(agglutinative)
-i suffix
(synthetic)
Plural of domo (“house”):
domoj (Esp.)
domi (Ido)
Adjectives Agree with nouns Not declined Translation of “big dogs”:
grandaj hundoj (Esp.)
granda hundi (Ido)
Accusative
form
Mandatory Only when object
precedes subject
Translation of “I drink milk” / “I milk drink” / “Milk I drink”:
“mi trinkas lakton” / “mi lakton trinkas” / “lakton mi trinkas” (Esp.)
“me drinkas lakto” / “me lakto drinkas” / “lakton me drinkas” (Ido)
Proper
nouns
Sometimes rendered Never rendered Translation of “Europe”:
Eŭropo (Esp.)
Europa (Ido)
No. of
speakers
c. 100,000–2,000,000 c. 100–1,000

. . . Comparison between Esperanto and Ido . . .

This article is issued from web site Wikipedia. The original article may be a bit shortened or modified. Some links may have been modified. The text is licensed under “Creative Commons – Attribution – Sharealike” [1] and some of the text can also be licensed under the terms of the “GNU Free Documentation License” [2]. Additional terms may apply for the media files. By using this site, you agree to our Legal pages . Web links: [1] [2]

. . . Comparison between Esperanto and Ido . . .

© 2022 The Grey Earl INFO - WordPress Theme by WPEnjoy